Skip to Main Content

Evaluating Sources

A guide to evaluating the credibility of the sources of information you use in your assignments.

Bias / objectivity

Scales iconIt could be argued that it is impossible to be totally value-neutral (unbiased). As such, the best that can be hoped for is that perspectives/bias be recognised.

Even significantly biased data may still be useful as long as you recognise the bias. You may need to look for resources with differing bias to get a balanced picture.

  • Is it clear whether the content comes an advertiser or from a non-commercial source?
  • What is the purpose of the resource?
  • Is it trying to inform you or sell you something?
  • Does it make reasonable statements? Or dramatic claims?
  • Do you know what bias the author or publisher has?
  • Do a search on the author/publisher to see what other resources they are associated with. Does the source provide a balanced viewpoint, or just one side of an argument?

Authority

Authority-shield iconAre the persons responsible for the resource clearly identified?

  • Is contact information provided?
  • Are the authors recognised experts in their field?
  • Is there verifiable information about the author's credentials?
  • Is the publisher reputable and scholarly?

As you become more familiar with your subject area you will become more aware of which publishers have more authority.

For online resources i.e. websites/web pages etc…

  • Is the web page provided by an individual, a business, a government department or an educational institution?
  • Is there an "about us" page which tells you who runs the site and what its purpose is?

Accuracy

  • Target iconDo the facts fit with what you already know? Why / why not?
  • Are there cited (and verifiable) references for its information – this is just as necessary for online resources such as websites etc.
  • Does the information agree with that given by at least 2 other credible resources?
  • Does the information contradict itself?
  • Is the information complete or are there obvious gaps?
  • Do the facts provided seem too good to be true?

Currency

  • Calendar iconIs the information current and up-to-date? Does it need to be?
  • Is it clearly stated when the information was written and/or updated?
  • Is the information on the page obviously outdated?
  • Are there a lot of broken links?
  • Does the bibliography end some years ago?
  • Check with your lecturer how recent you assignment resources need to be. Many databases let you specify a date range when searching.

Utility

  • Utility-Swiss army knife iconIs the data what you really need?
  • Is it relevant to your information search?
  • Is this the best way to get the information you need?
  • Have you tried print and electronic sources available via One Search and JCU databases?
  • Google Scholar can also provide useful resources.

We acknowledge the Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the first inhabitants of the nation and acknowledge Traditional Owners of the lands where our staff and students, live, learn and work.Acknowledgement of Country

Creative Commons Licence
Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC BY-SA) 4.0 International License. Content from this Guide should be attributed to James Cook University Library. This does not apply to images, third party material (seek permission from the original owner) or any logos or insignia belonging to JCU or other bodies, which remain All Rights Reserved.

.