|
|
Popular |
|
Scholarly |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intention |
To inform and entertain a general audience. |
|
To present and/or report on
original research. |
|
|
Usually colourful and attractive; articles often have lots of illustrations and photographs. |
|
|
|
|
May be useful as introductory background reading to a new subject. |
|
|
|
Language |
Language generally
non-technical with no specialist knowledge assumed. Unfamiliar terms and concepts
are usually defined. |
|
Technical language (jargon) which
assumes specialised background knowledge. |
|
Author |
The authors are often journalists with little or no specialist knowledge of the subject. Their credentials are rarely given.
|
|
Authors' credentials as an
expert are explicitly presented, usually on the first page. |
|
Research |
No original research other than background reading and interviews is involved. |
|
Presents the results of original
research. |
|
References |
Rarely cites sources. |
|
All articles are rigorously
referenced with all sources cited. Usually contains footnotes and
bibliography. |
|
Peer Review? |
Articles are approved for publication by the editor |
Articles are approved for publication after review by the author's scholarly peers. |
Sources of information are generally categorised as primary, secondary or tertiary depending on their originality and their proximity to the source or origin.
For example, scientific information moves through a dissemination cycle. Initially, findings might be communicated informally by email, then presented at meetings before being formally published as a primary source. Once published, they will then be indexed in a bibliographic database, and repackaged and commented upon by others in secondary sources.
The designations of primary, secondary and tertiary differ between disciplines or subjects, particularly between what can generally be defined as the sciences and the humanities.
Primary sources for a critic studying the literature of the Second World War are different from those for a research scientist investigating a new drug for arthritis. The critic's primary sources are the poems, stories, and films of the era. The research scientist's primary sources are the results of laboratory tests and the medical records of patients treated with the drug. You should always check with your lecturer or tutor if in doubt.We acknowledge the Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the first inhabitants of the nation and acknowledge Traditional Owners of the lands where our staff and students, live, learn and work.
