It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.
A rapid review is conducted as an alternative to a systematic review, a rapid review follows the same methods and protocols as a systematic review, although components can be simplified and can be omitted if required. The timeframe for conducting a rapid review is considerably less than a systematic review.
Limitations
Search is not as comprehensive
There may only be one reviewer.
Possible non-blinded appraisal and selection
Limited/cautious interpretation of the findings
Limitations and potential biases when omitting components of the review process.
Can impact policy and practice but systematic reviews are still needed.
We acknowledge the Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples as the first inhabitants of the nation and acknowledge Traditional Owners of the lands where our staff and students, live, learn and work.